pacman - Archlinux32 fork of pacman

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author
2019-05-28	libmakepkg: add lint_config to validate SRCEXT/PKGEXT	Eli Schwartz
	These variables must begin with .src.tar / .pkg.tar respectively, so fail early if those expectations are not matched. This prevents makepkg from creating e.g. package files literally named "./pacman-5.1.3-1-x86_64" which are actually uncompressed tarballs. Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@archlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
2019-01-10	libmakepkg: add routine for linting $SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH	Eli Schwartz
	This can only ever be an int, and the specification states that a malformed timestamp should be considered a fatal error. https://reproducible-builds.org/specs/source-date-epoch/ Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@archlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
2018-11-02	Add meson.build files to build with meson	Dave Reisner
	Provide both build systems in parallel for now, to ensure that we work out all the differences between the two. Some time from now, we'll give up on autotools. Meson tends to be faster and probably easier to read/maintain. On my machine, the full meson configure+build+install takes a little under half as long as a similar autotools-based invocation. Building with meson is a two step process. First, configure the build: meson build Then, compile the project: ninja -C build There's some mild differences in functionality between meson and autotools. specifically: 1) No singular update-po target. meson only generates individual update-po targets for each textdomain (of which we have 3). To make this easier, there's a build-aux/update-po script which finds all update-po targets and runs them. 2) No 'make dist' equivalent. Just run 'git archive' to generate a suitable tarball for distribution.