| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Disk space checking is likely to be an unnecessary bottleneck to
people with reasonable partition sizes so add a configuration option
to allow it to be disabled/enabled as wanted.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Very basic prototyping for adding functionality to check free disk
space before performing package installs.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
We were including the header in a lot of places it is no longer used.
Additionally, use the correct autoconf macro for determining whether
d_type is available as a member: HAVE_STRUCT_DIRENT_D_TYPE.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Either we expose all low levels function dealing with pmdepend_t
(splitdep and depfree come to mind), or we don't.
Since none of the tools use depcmp, I chose to remove it. In the future,
we might want to expose higher level functions such as
alpm_find_satisfier, or just lower level functions like splitdep and
depfree together with depcmp.
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <chantry.xavier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <chantry.xavier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Cache bullshit only has relevance to be_files, so move it there.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
[Allan: BIG rebase]
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Implement this seemingly simple change in package.h:
typedef enum _pmpkgfrom_t {
- PKG_FROM_CACHE = 1,
- PKG_FROM_FILE
+ PKG_FROM_FILE = 1,
+ PKG_FROM_LOCALDB,
+ PKG_FROM_SYNCDB
} pmpkgfrom_t;
which requires flushing out several assumptions from around the codebase
with regards to usage of the PKG_FROM_CACHE value. Make some changes where
required to allow the switch, and now the correct value should be set (via a
crude hack) depending on whether a package was loaded as an entry in a local
db or a sync db.
This patch underwent some big rebasing from Allan and Dan.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
|
|
We no longer use these anywhere outside of sync.c, so do the rename and add
static to their definition to meet our coding standards.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
As reported in FS#20221, we don't always do the right thing when installing
a group and using the --needed option. This was due to the code pulling
packages based on what was already in the transaction's add list, but
completely ignoring the fact that we may have already seen and skipped this
same package in an earlier repository.
Add a list to the private _alpm_sync_pkg() function that allows us to have
this extra information so we don't mistakenly downgrade a package when using
--needed.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Rather than say we can't find the target after saying "No, I guess I don't
want to install this", we should make sure the ignored status gets passed
all the way through. This fixes FS#19866.
Pactest is also included that failed before due to the fact that we normally
treat an unfound package as a reason to exit with a non-zero status.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Conder <j@skurvy.no-ip.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
This patch fixes the phonon/qt issue, if all to-be-upgraded packages are
explicit targets (ie. only not-yet-installed packages are pulled by
resolvedeps). This condition covers the most common situations, for example
it should hold with every -Su operation.
After this patch sync405.py passes, but sync406.py doesn't.
The work is inspired by the patch of Henning Garus, thanks for his work:
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2010-February/010429.html
(I moved the alpm_list_diff computation to sync.c in order to compute it
only once.)
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
After commit df99495b82 pacman downloaded files from the first repo only,
and reported corrupted packages for all files from other repos.
The download_size was set to 0 for _all_ transaction packages after
downloading some files from the first repo. This code-block was moved to its
correct place.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
And add a new info level for this piece of data.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Conder <j@skurvy.no-ip.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
If the -d switch was invoked with -S (or -U), the removes list was simply
lost, because trans->remove was computed in an
"if(!(trans->flags & PM_TRANS_FLAG_NODEPS))" block.
I've added a new pactest file, sync045.py (derived from sync043.py) to test
this.
Additionally, I did some other minor cleanups in sync_prepare:
* preferred list is not needed anymore
* I removed a needless alpm_list_remove_dupes line (the target list should
not contain dupes at all)
* I moved alpm_list_free(remove); to cleanup part to eliminate a possible
memleak
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
It was probably a bad idea to modify the target directly in case of
repo/pkg syntax.
Duplicating it also allows us to keep the original target string, which
is more informative when printing errors.
Also remove a duplicated error message from libalpm, and improve the
message already returned to the frontend.
$ pacman -S foo/bar
before
error: repository 'foo' not found
error: 'bar': no such repository
after
error: 'foo/bar': could not find repository for target
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
-int alpm_trans_sysupgrade(int enable_downgrade);
-int alpm_trans_sync(char *target);
-int alpm_trans_add(char *target);
-int alpm_trans_remove(char *target);
+int alpm_sync_sysupgrade(int enable_downgrade);
+int alpm_sync_target(char *target);
+int alpm_sync_dbtarget(char *db, char *target);
+int alpm_add_target(char *target);
+int alpm_remove_target(char *target);
* functions renaming
* add new sync_dbtarget which allows to specify the db
* repo/ syntax handling is moved to frontend
( should implement FS#15141)
* group handling is moved to backend
( see http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2009-June/008847.html )
|
|
This basically started with this change :
/* Transaction */
struct __pmtrans_t {
- pmtranstype_t type;
pmtransflag_t flags;
pmtransstate_t state;
- alpm_list_t *packages; /* list of (pmpkg_t *) */
+ alpm_list_t *add; /* list of (pmpkg_t *) */
+ alpm_list_t *remove; /* list of (pmpkg_t *) */
And then I have to modify all the code accordingly.
|
|
This patch utilizes the power of sync.c to fix FS#3492 and FS#5798.
Now an upgrade transaction is just a sync transaction internally (in alpm),
so all sync features are available with -U as well:
* conflict resolving
* sync dependencies from sync repos
* remove unresolvable targets
See http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2009-June/008725.html
for the concept.
We use "mixed" target list, where PKG_FROM_FILE origin indicates local
package file, PKG_FROM_CACHE indicates sync package. The front-end can add
only one type of packages (depending on transaction type) atm, but if alpm
resolves dependencies for -U, we may get a real mixed trans->packages list.
_alpm_pkg_free_trans() was modified so that it can handle both target types
_alpm_add_prepare() was removed, we use _alpm_sync_prepare() instead
_alpm_add_commit() was renamed to _alpm_upgrade_targets()
sync.c (and deps.c) was modified slightly to handle mixed target lists,
the modifications are straightforward. There is one notable change here: We
don't create new upgrade trans in sync.c, we replace the pkgcache entries
with the loaded package files in the target list (this is a bit hackish) and
call _alpm_upgrade_targets(). This implies a TODO (pkg->origin_data.db is
not accessible anymore), but it doesn't hurt anything with pacman front-end,
so it will be fixed later (otherwise this patch would be huge).
I updated the documentation of -U and I added a new pactest, upgrade090.py,
to test the syncdeps feature of -U.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Sometimes "foo conflicts with bar" information is not enough, see this
thread: http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=77647. That's why I added
a new reason field to our pmconflict_t struct that stores the packager-
defined conflict that induced the fact that package1 conflicts with
package2.
I modified the front-end (in callback.c, sync.c, upgrade.c) to print this
new information as well.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
|
|
If the user switches from unstable repo to a stable one, it is quite hard to
sync its system with the new repo (the user will see many "Local is newer
than stable" messages, nothing more). That's why I introduced -Suu, which
treats a sync package like an upgrade, iff the package version doesn't match
with the local one's.
I added a new pactest (sync104.py) to test this, and I updated the
documentation of -Su.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
[Dan: slight doc reword]
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
$ sudo pacman -S mc
Old output:
***********
:: mc conflicts with mc-mp. Remove mc-mp? [Y/n] y
...
(1/1) checking for file conflicts [################] 100%
(1/1) installing mc [################] 100%
New output:
***********
:: mc conflicts with mc-mp. Remove mc-mp? [Y/n] y
...
(1/1) checking for file conflicts [################] 100%
(1/1) removing mc-mp [################] 100%
(1/1) installing mc [################] 100%
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
This fixes FS#14899. When running an -Sp operation without servers
configured for a repository, we would segfault, so add an assert to the
backend method returning the first server preventing a null pointer
dereference.
In addition, add a new error code to libalpm that indicates we have no
servers configured for a repository. This makes -Sy and -S <package>
operations fail gracefully and helpfully when a repo is set up with no
servers, as the default mirrorlist in Arch is provided this way.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
The main purpose of this function to make our code more readable.
It frees transaction specific fields of pmpkg_t. (It is used when a package
is removed from the target list.)
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
There is apparently no need to handle the re-compression manually when
applying a xdelta patch in case of bzip2 or xz.
Only gzip needs to be handled specifically for disabling timestamp with the
-n option.
After this patch, if xdelta is enhanced with xz support (1-line patch), it
will be transparent from pacman side.
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
"Foo replaces bar" simply means that "foo is a new version of bar".
So this patch refactors the code to use this "rule".
_alpm_sync_sysupgrade now does the following for each local package [bar]
(pseudo-code):
for db in syncdbs {
if(db contains bar) {check if db/bar is an upgrade; break;}
replacers = find(bar replacers in db);
if(replacers!=NULL) {ask_user; break;}
}
Note:
1. Replacers are grouped per repo. If more than one package replace bar in
a repo, all of them are considered ("package set of bar replacers").
2. If repo1/foo1 and repo2/foo2 both replaces bar, only repo1/foo1 is
considered (if repo1 stands before repo2 in pacman.conf). FS#11737 is fixed.
3. It can happen that pacman doesn't consider any replacer, if it found a
literal "earlier", so sync132.py modified accordingly (btw, that situation
should not appear irl).
The new sysupgrade code doesn't use sync_newversion(), so I removed the
"local is newer than repo" message, which was annoying with -Qu and
SyncFirst.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
This fixes a bug introduced by my previous changes which changes the
behavior of IgnorePkg/IgnoreGroup to allow the user to remove unresolvable
packages from the transaction. The bug is that the target-list was no
longer being consulted first to resolve dependencies, which means that if
two packages in the sync database satisfied a dependency, and the user
explicitly requested one of those two packages in the sync, the other
package was still being pulled in.
A new test was added, sync993.py, to verify the desired behavior.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Ischo <bji-keyword-pacman.3644cb@www.ischo.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Bryan Ischo <bji-keyword-pacman.3644cb@www.ischo.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
pmsyncpkg_t data sructure was removed:
1. pmpkg_t.reason is used instead of pmsyncpkg_t.newreason. (The target
packages come from sync repos, so we can use this field without any
problems. Upgrade transaction also uses this field to store this info.)
2. pmsyncpkg_t.removes was moved to pmpkg_t.removes.
This step requires careful programming, because we don't duplicate packages
when we add them to trans->packages. So we modify sync pkgcache when we
add this transaction-only info to our package. Hence it is important to
free this list when we remove any package from the target list
(remove_unresolvable, remove_conflicts, trans_free), otherwise this could
confuse the new sync transactions (with non-pacman GUI).
Overall, our code became ~100 line shorter, and we can call our helper
functions directly on trans->packages in sync.c, we don't need to maintain
parallel package lists.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
From now on _alpm_db_find_fileconflicts() works with upgrade and remove
target lists (like checkdeps), which makes it transaction independent
(we still need a trans param because of the progressbar). This is a small
step towards the universal transaction. So we call this function directly
from sync.c before commiting the remove transaction. This is much safer,
but we can get false fileconflict error alarms in some tricky cases
("symlinks puzzle" etc).
The patch on find_fileconflict looks complex, but it is mainly an
"indent-patch", the new code-part can be found after the
/* check remove list ... */ comment, and I modified something around the
"file has changed hand" case (see comment modifications in the code).
Unfortunately sync.c became more ugly, because we have to create 2 parallel
internal transactions: to avoid duplicated work, upgrade transaction is
used to load package data (filelists). This problem will disappear, when
we finally get rid of internal transactions.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Resolvedeps reports error when it cannot resolve some dependencies, puts
them into the *data list, and set pm_errno. If user removes the
unresolvable packages from the target list, we have no error anymore,
so from now on we free *data list (we eliminate a memleak) and unset
pm_errno.
(Additionally I removed two needless lines from the code, unresolvable list
is always freed in cleanup.)
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
This patch fixes FS#12059.
Now sync_addtarget can return with PM_ERR_PKG_IGNORED, which indicates that
although the requested package was found it is in ignorepkg, so alpm could
not add it to the transaction. So the front-end can decide what to do.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
1) The changes to sync.c look big but there are mostly caused by
the indentation. Fix a bug where download_size == 0 because the packages and
deltas are already in the cache, but we still need to build the deltas list
and apply the deltas to create the final package.
2) Fix the gzip / md5sum issue by switching to xdelta3, disabling external
recompression and using gzip -n in pacman, and disable bsdtar compression
and using gzip -n in makepkg.
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <shiningxc@gmail.com>
|
|
The from_md5 and to_md5 fields were a nice extra safety, which would avoid
trying to apply deltas on corrupted package files. However, they are not
strictly necessary, since xdelta should be able to detect that on its own.
The main problem is that it is impossible to compute these informations from
the delta only. So repo-add would not be able to compute the delta entry
based on just the delta file.
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Don't prompt the user for unignore of IgnorePkg/IgnoreGroup packages,
except for packages explicitly listed for sync by the user. This
eliminates many unnecessary prompts when IgnorePkg/IgnoreGroup is
used.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Ischo <bryan@ischo.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Enabled a new prompt to ask the user if they'd like to remove
unresolvable packages from the transaction rather than failing it.
Many pactest tests that used to fail now return success codes, because
pacman now issues a prompt allowing the user to cancel rather than
failing many transactions, and the pactest scripts always choose to
cancel with no error rather than failing. The only net effect is that
the return status of pacman is now 0 in cases where it used to be
nonzero.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Ischo <bryan@ischo.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
This change reorganizes the internal code so that packages are
resolved one at a time instead of all at once from a list. This will
allow a future checkin to prompt the user to see if they'd rather
remove unresolvable packages from the transaction and continue, or
fail the transaction. This change does not affect the actual behavior
of libalpm and all tests pass without changes.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Ischo <bryan@ischo.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
From now on -Qu is an "outdated package" filter on local database.
(This is a behaviour change.)
This patch fixes some memleaks and makes the code cleaner, for details see
my comment on FS#7884.
FS#11868 is implemented.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
These two functions now take directly a package list rather than a database.
checkdbconflicts was renamed to checkconflicts.
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <shiningxc@gmail.com>
|
|
This patch kills one of our hackish pseudo transactions: PRINTURIS.
(The other one is -Sw)
From now on, front-end must not call trans_commit in case of -Sp,
it should print the uris of target packages "by hand" instead.
PRINTURIS flag was removed, NOCONFLICTS flag can be passed to skip
conflict checks.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
* Change the return values to be more informative.
It was previously boolean, only indicating if a sync package was newer than
a local package.
Now it is a simple wrapper to vercmp, handling the force flag.
* Remove the verbose output from _alpm_pkg_compare_versions.
The "force" message is not so useful.
The "package : local (v1) is newer than repo (v2)" message can be moved to
-Su operation.
For the -S operation, it is better to have something like :
"downgrading package from v1 to v2"
* Don't display the "up to date -- skipping" and "up to date -- reinstalling"
messages, when the local version is newer than the sync one.
* Fix the behavior of --needed option to not skip a target when the local
version is newer, and clarify its description.
* Add a new alpm_pkg_has_force function
This allows us to access the pkg->force field like any other package fields.
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry <shiningxc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Debug messages were removed from _alpm_sync_find, because it is a general
purpose function; debug messages should be placed in the caller function.
I inserted "adding package foo-1.0-1 to the transaction targets" debug
message to find_replacements and sync_sysupgrade.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Now '-S provision' handling is done in the back-end.
In case of multiple providers, the first one is selected (behavior change:
deleted provision002.py). The old processing order was: literal, group,
provision; the new one: literal, provision, group. This is more rational,
but "pacman -S group" will be slower now. "pacman -S repo/provision" also
works. Provision was generalized to dependencies, so you can resolve deps by
hand: "pacman -S 'bash>2.0'" or "pacman -S 'core/bash>2.0'" etc. This can be
useful in makepkg dependency resolving. The changes were documented in
pacman manual.
alpm_find_pkg_satisfiers and _alpm_find_dep_satisfiers functions were
removed, since they are no longer needed.
I added some verbosity to "select provider instead of literal" and
"fallback to group".
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
I divided resolvedeps into 2 functions. The new _alpm_resolvedep function
will resolve one dependency, for example the 'foo>=1.0-1' dependency. It
can be useful in sync_addtarget refactoring.
The resolvedeps parameters were changed, to be coherent with recursedeps:
* the target-list is an alpm_list* instead of alpm_list**. This is OK,
because alpm_list_add == alpm_list_add_last
* syncpkg param was removed. list contains the to-be-installed packages,
resolvedeps will add the required dependencies into this list
* trans param was removed, it was used in QUESTION() only, which can be used
on the main (handle->trans) transaction only (because the front-end cannot
access our pseudo-transactions at all!).
The patch fixes some wrong dynamic pmdepmissing_t usage.
I did a behavior change (and sync1003.py was modified accordingly), which
needs some explanation: The old resolvedeps didn't elect packages from
'remove' list. I've dropped this because I don't want that 2nd excluding
list param. In fact, in real life, we ~never need this rule. Resolvedeps is
called before checkconflicts, so only -Su's %REPLACES% packages are sitting
in 'remove' list. This means, that we have the replacement packages in our
target list. Usually "foo replaces bar" means, that bar isn't in our repos
any more, so resolvedeps *cannot* elect it; but usually it won't try it at
all, because foo is in the target list, and it is expected to satisfy
'bar>=1.0-1'-like dependencies too. Since checkdeps and checkconflicts is
done after resolvedeps, this cannot cause any harm.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|