pacman - Archlinux32 fork of pacman

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author
2019-03-19	drop DU* config variables	Santiago Torres
	Since DUFLAGS and DUPATH are not needed anymore remove them from the source Signed-off-by: Santiago Torres <santiago@archlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
2019-03-19	build: remove references to variable replacements from pacman-optimize	Eli Schwartz
	MODECMD and OWNERCMD are not used by pacman itself, so we don't need to check for and replace them now that pacman-optimize is removed. Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@archlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
2018-11-28	meson: be more accurate in comments when generating processed scripts	Eli Schwartz
	Instead of assuming all scripts are .sh.in and leaving a comment to that effect, just take the input file directly. Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
2018-11-02	Add meson.build files to build with meson	Dave Reisner
	Provide both build systems in parallel for now, to ensure that we work out all the differences between the two. Some time from now, we'll give up on autotools. Meson tends to be faster and probably easier to read/maintain. On my machine, the full meson configure+build+install takes a little under half as long as a similar autotools-based invocation. Building with meson is a two step process. First, configure the build: meson build Then, compile the project: ninja -C build There's some mild differences in functionality between meson and autotools. specifically: 1) No singular update-po target. meson only generates individual update-po targets for each textdomain (of which we have 3). To make this easier, there's a build-aux/update-po script which finds all update-po targets and runs them. 2) No 'make dist' equivalent. Just run 'git archive' to generate a suitable tarball for distribution.